Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@rajkundalia
Created April 30, 2025 18:48
Show Gist options
  • Save rajkundalia/178c54b77add205f03a703e629d7fc62 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save rajkundalia/178c54b77add205f03a703e629d7fc62 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Feature Lambda Architecture Kappa Architecture
Data Ingestion Typically involves landing raw data into a distributed file system (e.g., HDFS, S3) for the batch layer, and a message queue (e.g., Kafka, Kinesis) for the speed layer. Primarily relies on a durable, ordered message queue (e.g., Apache Kafka) as the central point of data ingestion for all data.
Design Philosophy Dual pipeline for batch and speed, merging at serving layer. Single, unified stream processing pipeline for all data.
Codebase Management Separate codebases for batch and speed processing, leading to potential duplication. Single codebase for stream processing logic, simplifying maintenance.
Data Flow Batch data processed periodically, real-time data processed continuously, merged for queries. All data (historical and real-time) ingested and processed as a continuous stream.
Operational Complexity Higher due to managing and orchestrating two distinct processing systems. Lower, with a single stream processing system to manage and monitor.
Latency Characteristics Low latency for real-time views, higher latency for batch views. Consistent latency for all data processing, dependent on stream processing capabilities.
Data Consistency Can be challenging to ensure consistency between the batch and speed layers' outputs. Easier to achieve consistency as all data undergoes the same processing logic.
Update/Fix Complexity Requires modifications and deployments in both batch and speed layers. Typically involves re-processing the entire historical stream with the updated logic.
Fault Tolerance Redundancy through dual processing, but recovery can involve coordinating both layers. Relies heavily on the fault tolerance of the stream processing system; simpler recovery (reprocessing).
Development Overhead Often requires implementing business logic twice. Single implementation of business logic for all data.
Ideal Use Cases Systems needing guaranteed accurate historical views alongside low-latency real-time insights, leveraging existing batch infrastructure. Systems prioritizing operational simplicity, consistent processing, and near real-time analytics across all data.
@rajkundalia
Copy link
Author

Created using ChatGPT and also used: https://ozh.github.io/ascii-tables/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment